III.2
Direct and Indirect Effects of Grasshopper Integrated Pest Management
Chemicals and Biologicals on Nontarget Animal Life
L. C. McEwen, C. M. Althouse, and B. E. Petersen
Direct Effects
Sublethal Effects
Cholinesterase
Inhibition
Indirect Effects
Small Mammal
Studies
Golden
Eagle Study
References
Download the Printable Version
of this Article.
(Editor's Note: Acephate is no longer approved by EPA for rangeland
grasshopper control.)
Initially there were 16 objectives (11 terrestrial and
5 aquatic) for the environmental monitoring studies of the Grasshopper
Integrated Pest Management (GHIPM) Project. Most of the terrestrial
objectives were concerned with determining effects of the grasshopper
control methods and materials on birds. Studies varied from total
bird population response after spray operations or bait treatments
to toxicology tests with individual birds.
Small-mammal population effects and toxicology were
investigated with one chemical (acephate). Some limited small-mammal
observations also were obtained in areas sprayed with malathion
and Sevin® 4-oil. Aquatic
objectives were to investigate toxic effects of malathion and carbaryl
on endangered fish in tank tests and to determine effects of grasshopper
spray programs on fish and aquatic invertebrates in the field.
Other objectives included (1) evaluation of hazards
to endangered species through study of related surrogate species,
(2) determination of the significance of bird predation as a biological
control of grasshoppers in an IPM program, and (3) wildlife tests
with the candidate materials Beauveria bassiana (a fungal
organism) and diflubenzuron (an insect growth inhibitor). More than
20 papers have been published in peer-reviewed journals on the GHIPM
Project's environmental monitoring work, and other papers are in
press.
Direct
Effects
Direct effects on nontarget fish and wildlife of GHIPM
materials may be lethal or sublethal. Unlike the organochlorine
pesticides, such as dieldrin, chlordane, heptachlor, and toxaphene,
formerly used for range grasshopper control (and still in use in
some parts of the world) the current GHIPM chemicals do not kill
wildlife by direct toxicity (McEwen 1982). There may be some rare
exceptions to this statement, such as individual small nestlings
of passerine (bird) species that are unusually sensitive to carbaryl
or malathion being directly sprayed on an open nest. On the whole,
however, GHIPM Project-funded investigators have seen only a very
few such possible cases in a large number of nest observations.
And none of these bird deaths could be positively attributed to
chemical control materials.
At the malathion ultralow-volume (ULV) application rate
of 8 fl oz/acre (0.58 kg/ha) and the Sevin 4-Oil formulation rate
of 20 fl oz/acre (1.44 kg/ha) (carbaryl active ingredient [AI] rate
of 0.56 kg/ha), there is very little possibility of toxicity-caused
mortality of upland birds, mammals, or reptiles, and none has been
observed.
However, these pesticides are more toxic to aquatic
life: direct overspray of small ponds kills many aquatic invertebrates
and may kill sensitive fish species. The risk is lower in flowing
streams because the chemical is transported downstream and diluted
more rapidly. Consequently, nonspray buffer zones around aquatic
habitat must be observed (see chapter III.8).
Lower-level exposure from pesticide drift or runoff (in contrast
to direct overspray) does not kill fish but can be lethal to certain
aquatic invertebrates (Beyers et al. 1995; also see chapter III.6).
One of our main environmental monitoring objectives
was to determine effects of grasshopper control treatments on rangeland
bird populations. We investigated 13 different grasshopper control
treatments with GHIPM materials (malathion, Sevin 4-Oil, carbaryl
bait, or Nosema locustae). We studied effects on total bird
populations by concurrently conducting extensive line transect counts
(Emlen 1977) before and after insecticide application in both treatment
and control (untreated) plots. Total birds (total individuals of
all species) did not change (P > 0.05) in the posttreatment
periods (George et al. 1995). Populations of one highly insectivorous
species, the western meadowlark (Sturnella neglecta), did
consistently decrease at 10 and 21 days posttreatment. We presumed
that was due to reduced food availability because there was no evidence
of toxic signs in the remaining meadowlarks, and no dead ones were
found. Comparative avian population response to many different pesticides
used or tested for grasshopper control can be found in a report
by McEwen (1982).
Back to Top of Page
Sublethal
Effects
Sublethal exposure to GHIPM pesticides is highly probable
for wildlife inhabiting sprayed rangeland. The routes of exposure
include dermal from direct hit or by moving through sprayed vegetation,
ingestion in food or drinking water, and inhalation. The effects
of sublethal exposure can vary from biological insignificance to
convulsions and near death followed by recovery. Severe toxic signs
have not been observed in terrestrial wildlife following GHIPM treatments.
The potential for sublethal toxic effects can be minimized by use
of bait formulations. Dry bait formulations use less actual chemical
per acre or hectare and limit the route of exposure primarily to
ingestion of affected insects. In comparison, liquid sprays result
in multiple exposure routes (dermal, inhalation, and ingestion of
coated vegetation as well as insects). Consumption of bait (bran
particles) by wildlife is negligible because of the small size of
bran particles and the low treatment rates used for GHIPM (2 to
5 lb/acre or 2.2 to 5.6 kg/ha of bait containing 2 percent carbaryl).
Use of bait treatments provides an environmentally safe
means of obtaining some reduction of grasshopper densities in environmentally
sensitive areas (such as habitat for endangered plants or animals).
Vesper sparrow survival, growth, and fledging rates were not affected
by carbaryl bait treatments around the nest areas (Adams et al.
1994). Total bird numbers were not reduced in a large area treated
for grasshopper control with carbaryl bait (George et al. 1992a).
Bait treatments at GHIPM rates reduce the potential for aquatic
contamination (less drift and less chemical). Baits also appear
safe for bees and pollinators of endangered plants (see chapter
III.4 and chapter III.5).
Back to Top of Page
Cholinesterase
Inhibition
All three of the GHIPM chemicals-carbaryl, malathion,
and acephate-are cholinesterase (ChE) inhibitors. In vertebrates,
acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase are essential for
normal function of the nervous system. Severe inhibition (>60
percent) often leads to death of the animal (fig. III.2-1). Moderately
severe inhibition (40-60 percent) affects coordination, behavior,
and foraging ability and can lead to death from other stresses of
survival in the wild, such as weather or predators. Effects of lower
levels of brain ChE inhibition (<40 percent) are still an open
question regarding biological significance (Grue et al. 1991). In
our samples of birds and mammals from areas treated with carbaryl,
malathion, or acephate, we have not found any animals with >40
percent brain ChE inhibition, and only a few individuals inhibited
>20 percent (Fair et al. 1995, George et al. 1995, and Petersen
et al., in prep).
 |
| Figure III.2-1-Several
highly toxic pesticides were field-tested to determine efficacy
for grasshopper control and effects on nontarget life. Those
chemicals found to be too toxic and hazardous to wildlife were
not registered for use on rangeland. Most of the chemicals not
registered were severe cholinesterase inhibitors and caused
paralysis and death of beneficial birds, such as these Wilson's
phalaropes. (Photo by G. Powell of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service; reproduced by permission.) |
In a study of fish exposed to light drift of carbaryl
(Sevin 4-Oil), Beyers et al. (1995) detected no effects on brain
ChE. Blood plasma ChE also can be used as an indicator of pesticide
exposure: effects of malathion on kestrels and carbaryl (Sevin 4-Oil)
effects on golden eagles were reported by Taira (1994).
These results suggest that ChE inhibition is not a problem
for upland wildlife when GHIPM chemicals are applied but do not
mean that attention to accuracy and rigor of applications can be
relaxed. Beyers et al. (1994) found that in water, concentrations
of carbaryl as low as 1.3 mg/ L (p/m) and of malathion as low as
9.1 mg/L were lethal to fish. Young kestrels died from malathion
exposures of only 30 mg per kg of body weight (McEwen et al. 1993
unpubl.), much lower than lethal dosages for other species of birds
(>100 to >400 mg/kg, Smith 1987).
A recent study by Nicolaus and Lee (1999) suggested
a formerly unrecognized effect of organophosphate exposure. Birds
that fed on affected insects developed a strong aversion to those
insect species and would no longer capture them for food, even after
the insects were free of contamination. Thus surviving birds were
indirectly denied major food sources.
Back to Top of Page
Indirect
Effects
The most frequently asked question about effects on
wildlife of grasshopper control is, What about the effects on birds
of the loss of the insect food base? Much of our environmental monitoring
effort was directed at this problem.
A 3-year investigation of indirect effects of malathion
on nesting birds was conducted in Idaho. After a year of pretreatment
study, two areas of rangeland were sprayed with the standard 8 fl
oz/acre (0.58 kg/ha) ULV formulation of malathion. Intensive studies
were conducted to measure effects on the insect and invertebrate
populations and on survival and growth of Brewer's sparrow (Spizella
breweri) and sage thrasher (Oreoscoptes montanus) nestlings
(Howe 1993, Howe et al. 1996 and 2000).
Although the total invertebrate availability was significantly
reduced by the spray applications, nesting birds switched their
diets to the remaining insects and reproduced as successfully as
birds on untreated comparison plots (Howe et al. 1996 and 2000).
Adults had to forage longer on sprayed plots, and nestlings showed
a higher propensity for parasitic blowfly (Protocalliphora braueri)
infestation (Howe 1991, 1992), both of which might affect survival
in some situations. Those effects were not significant in this study.
Prespray grasshopper densities were low (1-4 per square yard or
square meter) on all plots and were significantly reduced in the
postspray period. This probably made the food availability test
more rigorous than an operational grasshopper control program, where
prespray densities are much higher and even postspray grasshopper
densities usually exceed 1 or 2 per square yard or square meter.
Effects of Sevin 4-Oil sprays on killdeer populations
were investigated in North Dakota. Two large treated areas were
studied. One was sprayed with the standard rate of 20 oz/acre of
formulation (16 oz Sevin 4-Oil + 4 oz diesel oil), and the other
area received a lower rate of 16 oz/acre (12 oz Sevin 4-Oil + 4
oz diesel oil). These rates translated to 0.56 and 0.45 kg/ha of
carbaryl AI respectively. No toxic signs and no mortality were observed
in the killdeer.
Effects on foraging and diet of the killdeer were examined
by both direct observation and analysis of stomach contents (Fair
et al. 1995a). The insect capture rate by foraging killdeer increased
during the period when affected insects were easily available 2
days after treatment (Fair et al. 1995b). No other differences in
food habits were detected.
A test of carbaryl bait effects on vesper sparrow (Pooecetes
gramineus) nestling growth and survival was conducted in North
Dakota. This study simulated the hot spot method of treating small
grasshopper infestations with carbaryl bait. There was no difference
in any of the productivity parameters between nests on treated and
untreated sites (Adams et al. 1994). Adult sparrows on treated sites
had to forage farther from the nests to obtain food but did so successfully.
Grasshoppers comprised 68 percent of all food deliveries to nestlings
even though grasshopper densities were <1 per square meter. The
ability of birds to capture a preferred food, even when grasshopper
densities are extremely low, supports the value of predation by
birds as a preventive force against grasshopper increase in an IPM
approach to grasshopper management (see chapter
I.10, Birds and Wildlife as Grasshopper Predators).
Biennial grasshopper infestations in southeastern Alaska
provided an opportunity to examine bird population response to the
extreme differences in grasshopper abundance and availability that
occur naturally. Densities alternate between >25 per square yard
in high years and <1 per square yard in low years. This phenomenon
apparently occurs because of a synchronized 2-year life cycle of
the Melanoplus sanguinipes grasshopper species in the population.
Birds were counted on permanently marked transects in 2 high and
2 low years, and nesting success of Savannah sparrows (Passerculus
sandwichensis), the most abundant bird species, was measured.
Total bird populations did not differ among years (P >
0.05).
Nesting success showed a trend of lower clutch size
and nestling growth rates in the low grasshopper years (1991 and
1993) but not significantly (P > 0.05) (Miller et al.
1994). Grasshoppers constituted >45 percent of the birds's diet
numerically and an even greater proportion of biomass in the high
grasshopper years (1990 and 1992) (McEwen et al. 1993 unpubl. Miller
and McEwen 1995). The birds also managed to search out and capture
grasshoppers in the low years, indicating their preference for this
important food source. However, the breeding birds were able to
switch their main food items to other insects (beetles, Hemiptera,
larvae of Lepidoptera and others) in the low grasshopper years.
Rangeland wildlife has adapted to variable
food availability and environmental conditions over the long term.
Evidence of this was observed in North Dakota studies. An extreme
drought in 1988 resulted in avian nesting failures and population
declines. The effects on bird populations did not carry over to
the succeeding years, when precipitation was in the normal range
(George et al. 1992b; see also chapter III.7).
Back to Top of Page
Small
Mammal Studies
 |
| Figure III.2-2-Kangaroo
rat being released after capture in a live-trap for study on
a rangeland-grasshopper control area. Small mammals were generally
less vulnerable to pesticide effects than birds inhabiting sprayed
areas. (Photo by L. C. McEwen of Colorado State University;
reproduced by permission.) |
Small mammals generally are not affected as much as
birds in the same area where a pesticide application is made, probably
because small mammals generally are not exposed to as much toxicant
as birds are. Most small mammals are nocturnal and are often in
underground burrows during and immediately after a treatment; thus
there is more time for the chemical to dissipate before small mammals
are exposed (fig. III.2-2). Deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus)
collected on a malathion-sprayed area had lower residues than
birds from the same sites (McEwen et al. 1989 unpubl.). Many small-
mammal species also are inherently more resistant to specific toxicants
than birds (Nimmo and McEwen 1994).
Effects of acephate and methamidophos (an acephate metabolite)
on small mammals were studied on short grass range in Colorado.
Results have not been completely analyzed, but preliminary data
indicate a decrease in populations of certain species due to a combination
of greater sensitivity to chemical toxicity and reduced competitive
ability with other species. Deer mice were twice as sensitive to
methamidophos (the lethal dose to 50 percent, or LD50,
was 9 mg/kg) than the other two most common species, grasshopper
mice (Onychomys leucogaster) and 13-lined ground squirrels
(Spermophilus tridecemlineatus). The LD50 for both the latter
was 21 mg/kg (Stevens 1989). Field live-trapping studies indicated
postspray decreases of deer mice but not of the grasshopper mice
and ground squirrels. Data analysis and manuscripts are still in
progress on these studies (Althouse et al. unpubl., McEwen et al.,
in prep.).
Limited live trapping studies on malathion-sprayed areas
in North Dakota showed no posttreatment decreases in abundant populations,
primarily deer mice, and studies of carbaryl-sprayed areas at other
locations had a similar outcome (McEwen et al. unpubl. 1988). An
investigation of malathion ULV (8 fl oz/acre or 0.58 kg/ha) applied
in Nebraska found no effects on small-mammal populations (Erwin
and Sharpe 1973).
Back to Top of Page
Golden
Eagle Study
Golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) are a protected
species and also are designated as a species of concern by wildlife
conservation and land management agencies. This species also has
special significance for Native Americans. Golden eagles nest in
remote rangeland areas and often are found on areas slated for grasshopper
control. Because of these concerns and problems, a study was initiated
on the Western North Dakota IPM Demonstration Area where nesting
territories and spray blocks often overlap.
Active nests of golden eagles were located and randomly
selected for Sevin 4-Oil treatments or left unsprayed in 1993 and
1994. Overall, 12 nest areas were sprayed with Sevin 4-Oil at 20
fl oz/acre (1.4 kg/ha) or 8 oz/acre AI(0.56 kg/ha AI) carbaryl.
Approximately 10 ha were treated around each nest. For comparison,
the investigators left eight nest areas untreated. At these control
nests, the spray plane flew the same pattern and length of time
but did not release any spray. Some nests contained two nestlings
and some, a single nestling. The total number of treated nestlings
was 17, and untreated totaled 11. Treatments were made when the
eaglets were 4-7 weeks of age.
When the nestlings neared fledging age (10-11 weeks)
they were captured to (1) take biological measurements, (2) take
a 4- to 5-mL blood sample, and (3) attach a radio transmitter for
postfledging location and observations (telemetry) (O'Toole et al.
1999). Field work and data analysis are incomplete, but preliminary
results can be reported.
In 1993, two untreated and three treated fledglings
died from various causes unrelated to the treatments. In 1994, a
better prey year, all 6 untreated and 10 treated fledglings survived.
Postfledging telemetry studies indicated two behavior differences
in the eagles from sprayed nest areas: sprayed eagles tended to
perch longer and to preen more in afternoon observation periods.
These results will be reported by O'Toole et al. (in prep.). All
fledglings dispersed from their hatch areas by November each year
(except for one, which left by December 3, 1994), and radio signals
could no longer be detected in ground searches. Aerial telemetry
searches were conducted in 1995 to obtain more information on movements
and long-term survival rates.
Blood plasma ChE and other blood components were measured.
Golden eagles were found to have a higher proportion of butyrylcholinesterase
(75 percent) than acetylcholinesterase (25 percent) in plasma (Taira
1994). Blood samples from the treated nestlings had higher total
ChE activity than untreated, but not significantly (P = 0.11).
This was somewhat predictable in that blood samples were not taken
until 3 to 5 weeks after exposure, and an overcompensation or rebound
effect has been found in other species after light exposure to carbamates.
In summary, it appears that Sevin 4-Oil sprayed at the
GHIPM rate offers little risk to nesting golden eagles. With global
positioning system technology, spray planes could shut off and leave
a small unsprayed area of a few acres or hectares around active
nests, to leave the eagles completely unaffected. Similar studies
of effects of malathion sprays (8 fl oz/acre or 0.58 kg/ha) for
rangeland grasshopper control need to be conducted with young golden
eagles.
Back to
Top of Page
Previous Article
• Next Article
• Section III Contents
References
Cited
Adams, J. S.; Knight, R. L.; McEwen,
L. C.; George, T. L. 1994. Survival and growth of nestling vesper
sparrows exposed to experimental food reductions. The Condor 96:
739-748.
Beyers, D. W.; Sikoski, P. J. 1994.
Acetylcholinesterase inhibition in federally endangered Colorado
squawfish exposed to carbaryl and malathion. Environmental Toxicology
and Chemistry 13: 935-939.
Beyers, D. W.; Keefe, T. J.; Carlson,
C. A. 1994. Toxicity of carbaryl and malathion to two federally
endangered fishes, as estimated by regression and ANOVA. Environmental
Toxicology and Chemistry 13: 101-107.
Beyers, D. W.; Farmer, M. S.; Sikoski,
P. J. 1995. Effects of rangeland aerial application of Sevin-4-oil
on fish and aquatic invertebrate drift in the Little Missouri River,
North Dakota. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
28: 27-34.
Emlen, J. L. 1977. Estimating breeding
season bird densities from transect counts. Auk. 94: 455-468.
Erwin, W.,J.; Sharpe, R. S. 1978. Effect
of wide area ultralow volume application of malathion on small mammal
populations. Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Science 5:
25-28.
Fair, J. M.; Kennedy, P. L.; McEwen,
L. C. 1995a. Effects of carbaryl grasshopper control on nesting
killdeer in North Dakota. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
14: 881-890.
Fair, J. M.; Kennedy, P. L.; McEwen,
L. C. 1995b. Diet of nesting killdeer in North Dakota. Wilson Bulletin
107: 174-178.
George, T. L.; McEwen, L. C.; Fowler,
A. C. 1992a. Effects of a carbaryl bait treatment on nontarget wildlife.
Environmental Entomology 21: 1239-1247.
George, T. L.; Fowler, A. C.; Knight,
R. L.; McEwen, L. C. 1992b. Impacts of a severe drought on grassland
birds in western North Dakota. Ecological Applications 2(3): 275-284.
George, T. L.; McEwen, L. C.; Petersen
B. E. 1995. Effects of grasshopper control programs on bird populations
in western rangelands. Journal of Range Management 48: 336-342.
Grue, C. E.; Hart, A.D.M.; Mineau, P.
1991. Biological consequences of depressed brain cholinesterase
activity in wildlife. In: Mineau, P., ed. Cholinesterase-inhibiting
insecticides: their impact on wildlife and the environment. (Vol.
2 of the Chemicals in Agriculture series.) Amsterdam, London, New
York: Elsevier: 152-209.
Howe, F. P. 1991. Two new host species
for the parasitic blow fly Protocalliphora braueri. Wilson
Bulletin 103: 520-521.
Howe, F. P. 1992. Effects of Protocalliphora
braueri(Diptera: Calliphoridae) parasitism and inclement weather
on nestling sage thrashers. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 28(1):
141-143.
Howe, F. P. 1993. Effects of a grasshopper
insecticide application on diet, food delivery rates, growth, and
survival of shrubsteppe passerines. Ph.D. dissertation. Fort Collins,
CO: Colorado State University. 108 p.
Howe, F. P.; Knight, R. L.; McEwen,
L. C.; George, T. L. 1996. Direct and indirect effects of insecticide
applications on growth and survival of nestling passerines. Ecological
Applications 6: 1314-1324.
Howe, F. P.; Knight, R. L.; McEwen,
L. C.; George, T. L. 2000. Diet switching and food delivery by shrubsteppe
passerines in response to an experimental reduction in food. Western
North American Naturalist 60: 139-154.
McEwen, L. C. 1982. Review of grasshopper
pesticides vs. rangeland wildlife and habitat. In: Peek, J. M.;
Dalke, P. D., eds. Proceedings of the wildlife-livestock relationships
symposium; 20-24 April 1981; Coeur d'Alene, ID. Moscow, ID: University
of Idaho: 362-382.
Miller, C. K.; McEwen, L. C. 1995. Diet
of nesting savannah sparrows in interior Alaska. Journal of Field
Ornithology 66: 152-158.
Miller, C. K.; Knight, R. L.; McEwen,
L. C. 1994. Responses of nesting savannah sparrows to fluctuations
in grasshopper densities in interior Alaska. The Auk 111: 960-967.
Nicolaus, L. K.; Lee, H. 1999. Low acute
exposure to organophosphate produces long-term changes in bird feeding
behavior. Ecological Applications 9: 1039-1049.
Nimmo, D. W.; McEwen, L. C. 1994. Handbook
of ecotoxicology-pesticides. In: Calow, P., ed. Handbook of ecotoxicology,
vol. 2. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications. Chapter 8.
O'Toole, L. T.; Kennedy, P. L.; Knight,
R. L.; McEwen, L. C. 1999. Postfledging behavior of golden eagles.
Wilson Bulletin 111: 472-477.
Smith, G. J. 1987. Pesticide use and
toxicology in relation to wildlife: organophosphorus and carbamate
compounds. Resour. Publ. 170. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish
and Wildlife Service. 171 p.
Stevens, P. D. 1989. Acute toxicity
and inhibition of cholinesterase activity in small mammals following
exposure to methamidophos. M.S. thesis. Ft. Collins, CO: Colorado
State University. 51 p.
Taira, T. 1994. Blood analysis of American
kestrel and golden eagle nestlings exposed to malathion or carbaryl.
M.S. thesis. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University. 80 p.
References
Cited-Unpublished
Althouse, C. M.; McEwen, L. C.; Hoffman,
L. A. Influence of prior northern grasshopper mouse (Onychomys
leucogaster) and 13-lined ground squirrel (Spermophilus tridecemlineatus)
live trap captures on succeeding intra and interspecific captures.
Submitted to Journal of Mammalogy.
McEwen, L. C.; George, T. L.; Petersen,
B. E.; Beyers, D. W.; Fowler, A. C.; Howe, F. P. 1989. Environmental
monitoring. In: Cooperative Grasshopper Integrated Pest Management
Project, 1988 annual report. Boise, ID: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service: 82-102.
McEwen, L. C.; Petersen, B. E.; Beyers,
D. W.; Althouse, C. M.; Fair, J. M.; Schleve, G. R.; Bednarski,
L. T.; Taira, T. 1993. Environmental monitoring. In: Cooperative
Grasshopper Integrated Pest Management Project, 1993 annual report.
Boise, ID: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service: 127-142.
McEwen, L. C.; Althouse, C. M.; Logan,
J. A.; Stevens, P. D. (In preparation). Small mammal long-term population
response to 2 rates of methamidophos spray on mixed shortgrass/Atriplex
rangeland. Journal of Range Management or Environmental Toxicology
and Chemistry.
O'Toole, L. T.; McEwen, L. C.; Knight,
R. L. [In preparation.] Behavioral responses of post-fledging golden
eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) to Sevin 4-Oil applications in
the Little Missouri National Grassland, North Dakota. Environmental
Toxicology and Chemistry.
Petersen, B. E.; DeWeese, L. R.; McEwen, L. C.;
Palmer, D.; Ryder, R. A. Nesting success of lark buntings on rangeland
treated with acephate. Submitted to Journal of Range Management.
Back to
Top of Page
Previous Article
• Next Article
• Section III Contents
|