V.4
Utilization of Nonnative Rangeland Plants by Grasshoppers on the
Snake River Plains of Idaho
Dennis J. Fielding and M. A. Brusven
Diffuse Knapweed
Cheatgrass
and Crested Wheatgrass
Conclusions
Download the Printable Version
of this Article.
The Intermountain region of Idaho is highly susceptible to invasions
by exotic plant species. At many locations in southern Idaho, exotic
plant species comprise 70 to 90 percent of the plant biomass. Cheatgrass
(Bromus tectorum), medusahead wildrye (Taeniantherum asper),
knapweeds (Centaurea spp.), tumblemustard (Sisymbrium
altissimum), and Russian-thistle (Salsola kali) are widely
distributed annual or biennial weeds. Other introduced weeds threatening
rangelands in southern Idaho include leafy spurge (Euphorbia
esula) and rush skeletonweed (Chondrilla juncea). The
area infested by exotics continues to increase each year. Also,
people intentionally have established crested wheatgrass (Agropyron
cristatum), an exotic perennial bunchgrass, over vast acreages
of the Intermountain West.
To learn about the relationship between such exotic plant species
and grasshoppers, we investigated the food habits of the most common
grasshopper species in southern Idaho. We wanted to gain some insight
into the following questions: How palatable are these exotic plant
species to native grasshoppers? Do these exotics provide a significant
new resource for grasshoppers? Might grasshoppers limit the spread
of these new weeds?
We used microscopic analysis of the crops of grasshoppers to learn
about their food choices. By examining the contents of a grasshopper’s
crop under a microscope and comparing the surface characters (hairs,
hair structure, arrangement of cells, etc.) of the plant fragments
with known reference material, we were able to measure accurately
the relative proportion of different plant species and parts of
plants (stems, flowers, and leaves) ingested by the grasshopper.
Back to Top of Page
Diffuse
Knapweed
Diffuse knapweed (Centaurea diffusa) has spread rapidly
and widely across Idaho. Knapweeds contain a chemical, cnicin, that
is repellent to many herbivores. Concentrations of cnicin vary within
the plant: leaves surrounding the flowers have the highest concentrations,
and the stem epidermis and flowers have only trace quantities. Because
of the unpalatibility of knapweed, infested rangeland has greatly
reduced forage value for livestock and wildlife.
We used microscopic analysis to determine the use of diffuse knapweed
by the common grasshopper species Melanoplus sanguinipes.
A spurthroated grasshopper, M. sanguinipes is a very opportunistic
feeder. Egg hatch in this species often spreads out over a long
period, resulting in a highly variable life history. Much of a population
of this species typically matures during late summer droughts common
in southern Idaho. At such times, most late-maturing plant species
that retain some greenness will be a primary food item for M.
sanguinipes.
Our results showed that M. sanguinipes readily consumes
knapweed but not in proportion to its availability. The insect prefers
other plants, such as cheatgrass and tumblemustard, over knapweed.
In late summer, though, when most other plant species are dead,
knapweed comprises up to 50 percent of that species’ crop contents
(table V.4–1). Other plants that are still green then, such as rabbitbrush
(Chrysothamnus spp.), sagebrush (Artemesia spp.),
and certain lupine (Lupinus) species, also serve as food
sources. After autumn rains caused cheatgrass, an exotic annual,
to sprout in October, this grass comprised the bulk of M. sanguinipes’
diet.
Table V.4–1—Crop contents of M. sanguinipes, by percentage,
on knapweed-infested rangeland east of Jerome, ID, on five different
dates in 1989. Grasses were primarily cheatgrass with less than
5 percent western wheatgrass (Agropyron smithii)
|
|
June 30
|
July 20
|
Aug. 14
|
Sept. 6
|
Oct. 13
|
|
Diffuse knapweed
|
18
|
30
|
32
|
55
|
12
|
|
Other forbs
|
65
|
48
|
29
|
31
|
1
|
|
Grasses
|
8
|
13
|
27
|
7
|
86
|
|
Litter, detritus
|
9
|
9
|
13
|
7
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Percentages may exceed 100 due to rounding.
|
Back to Top of Page
Cheatgrass
and Crested Wheatgrass
Cheatgrass and another exotic grass species, crested wheatgrass,
dominate much of the landscape at lower elevations on the Snake
River Plains (figs. V.4–1 and –2). Crested wheatgrass, a perennial
bunchgrass, stays green longer in the season than does cheatgrass.
We investigated the food habits of M. sanguinipes and another
common grasshopper species, Aulocara elliotti, regarding
these two grasses.

Figure V.4–1—Cheatgrass,
an introduced annual grass, can dominate disturbed sites and is
widespread across Idaho and in other Pacific Northwest States (Photo
by Dennis Fielding, University of Idaho).

Figure V.4–2—Land
managers and ranchers often have used crested wheatgrass to reseed
areas of Idaho rangeland to enhance forage for livestock and in
doing so, sometimes create food sources for pest species of grasshoppers.
(U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management photo
by Mike Pellant.)
A. elliotti, a slantfaced grasshopper, is mostly limited
in its diet to grasses but is not selective among grasses. In southern
Idaho, populations of A. elliotti hatch early and mature at the
same time as the grasses on which they feed. In early summer, that
species eats crested wheatgrass and cheatgrass equally (table V.4–2).
However, as the season progresses and the cheatgrass dries, the
diet of A. elliotti consists of proportionally greater amounts
of crested wheatgrass.
In contrast, M. sanguinipes eats mostly cheatgrass in the
early summer. As the cheatgrass dries, the insect consumes greater
proportions of weedy forbs, such as tumblemustard and Russian-thistle
(table V.4–2). Crested wheatgrass did not comprise more than 20
percent of the insect’s diet at any time.
Table V.4–2—Crop contents of A. elliotti and M. sanguinipes,
by percentage, on a crested wheatgrass seeding north of Bliss, ID,
in 1990
|
|
Aulocara
elliotti
|
Melanoplus
sanguinipes
|
|
|
May 18
|
July 2
|
May 23
|
July 9
|
Aug. 13
|
|
Crested wheatgrass
|
37
|
75
|
16
|
16
|
19
|
|
Cheatgrass
|
60
|
17
|
56
|
22
|
17
|
|
Forbs
|
0
|
7
|
12
|
42
|
50
|
|
Litter, detritus
|
3
|
2
|
16
|
20
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Percentages may exceed 100 due to rounding.
|
Back to Top of Page
Conclusions
The manner in which evolutionary history has molded a grasshopper’s
food habits and other life-history traits decides how a grasshopper
will respond to exotic plants. On the Snake River Plains, the most
abundant grasshopper species—the ones most likely to achieve outbreak
densities—accept a variety of plants and will adapt readily to exotic
plant species.
Certain introduced weeds, especially tumblemustard and cheatgrass,
may represent a significant new resource for generalist feeders,
such as M. sanguinipes and Oedaleonotus enigma. Rangeland
dominated by these plants may provide a more favorable habitat for
these grasshoppers, compared to rangeland dominated by native perennial
grasses (see section IV, Modeling
and Population Dynamics). Less palatable weeds, such
as the knapweeds, probably do not provide a significant new resource
for native grasshopper populations in southern Idaho; our findings
indicate that diffuse knapweed may serve mostly as a survival food
during summer droughts.
Our study of grasshopper food habits suggests that land managers
should not count on these insects to slow the spread of noxious
weeds. While it is conceivable that at high densities grasshoppers
may eat large amounts of noxious weeds and reduce seed production,
grasshoppers also will eat other plants at the same time, reducing
competition to the weeds.
Grasshoppers with specialized feeding habits may offer a better
chance of controlling certain weeds. Hesperotettix viridis, for
example, feeds on broom snakeweed (Gutierrezia sarothrae).
Such specialist feeders probably would eat mainly native weeds or
exotics that are very close relatives of native plants. Specialist
feeders would not recognize novel plants as potential food items.
Acknowledgment
This research was supported under cooperative agreement number
ID 910–CA7–05 between the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau
of Land Management, and the University of Idaho.
Back to
Top of Page
Previous Article
• Next Article
• Section V Contents
|