|
Grasshopper
Management: An Integrated Approach
by David Branson, USDA-ARS-NPARL, Sidney, MT
Download Printable version (PDF)
GRASSHOPPERS:
Can We Prevent Outbreaks?
Over the years, grasshopper outbreaks have often plagued farmers
and ranchers in the Great Plains, competing with livestock, wildlife
and humans for food supplies. The most memorable examples occurred
in the 1860s and again in the 1930s when grasshoppers were so abundant
they ate practically everything, including the paint off barn walls.
Under more typical circumstances, grasshoppers consume an estimated
21-23% of the average annual range forage production, a lot, but
maybe not as damaging as it first appears (See "Beneficial
Grasshoppers?!"). However, about every 8-10 years, extensive
outbreaks can decimate range vegetation and lead to a mass migration
to cultivated crops.
 |
|
Spraying pesticides on rangeland
during a 1963 outbreak.
|
In Great Plains rangelands, grasshopper densities tend to increase
with drought and grazing intensities, and severe local outbreaks
can occur every year. Major grasshopper outbreaks tend to occur
during hot, dry weather cycles which lead to drastically reduced
range vegetation and increased grasshopper numbers. The grasshoppers
then compete with livestock and wildlife for the remaining vegetation.
In the past, pesticides have been the primary tools used to combat
grasshopper outbreaks on rangeland, with major infestations often
controlled by large cooperative spray programs. During the last
major outbreak, USDA/APHIS sprayed a record 13 million acres of
public and private land at a total cost of about $25 million.
 |
|
USDA-APHIS annual grasshopper
surveys have been used to predict grasshopper outbreaks. The
red color in the map above indicates high densities.
|
A similar effort is unlikely to be undertaken today. A lack of
government funding and increased environmental concerns and regulations
(particularly on public lands) have combined to put a damper on
such spraying efforts. Traditional pesticide use appears to be economical
on only about 40% of U.S. rangeland even in severe outbreaks, according
to economic models. Recently, new approaches have been developed
which increase the distance between sprayed swaths while still providing
good grasshopper control and cutting application costs by as much
as 50 to 60 percent. However, the economic realities of low livestock
and commodity prices have made it difficult for any grasshopper
spraying to be profitable. But what if producers and land managers
were able to reduce grasshopper problems without resorting to pesticides?
Building Toward a Solution
Until recently, little has been done in the line of preventative
grasshopper management; that is, to delay, shorten or reduce the
area or intensity of outbreaks before they overwhelm farm and ranch
operations. That is changing. Today, ARS scientists at the Northern
Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory in Sidney, Montana are developing
new management tactics for controlling periodic grasshopper outbreaks
in a cost effective and environmentally friendly fashion. The research
effort has a three-pronged approach.
 |
|
These cages allow researchers
to study grasshopper outbreaks and interactions between grazing
and grasshoppers under a variety of controlled conditions.
|
The first focuses on how grazing management can reduce grasshopper
outbreaks. That effort has already met with some success. ARS researchers
have been examining how the timing and intensity of livestock grazing
under a twice-over rotational system leads to a significant reduction
in grasshopper numbers when compared to a season long grazing system.
(See "Can Grazing Control Grasshoppers?")
The second research effort examines under what conditions grasshoppers
can increase or decrease rangeland vegetation by their effects on
nutrient recycling. This will help determine when grasshopper control
is a good idea and how grasshoppers impact the sustainability of
grazing on rangeland.
The third approach looks at what conditions, such as weather and
existing grasshopper densities, lead to larger grasshopper outbreaks,
as well as how habitat manipulation, predators and disease might
be better used to limit them. Although additional studies are needed,
this research points the way toward practical and affordable management
techniques for the future.
 |
|
Testing pathogen effects.
|
The Future
The goal of ARS personnel is to develop a sustainable grasshopper
management system that uses management practices and ecological
processes in place of nonrenewable resources such as pesticides.
ARS scientists want to develop a system that can maintain or improve
range conditions, while decreasing the impact of periodic grasshopper
outbreaks.
Ultimately, this research effort will provide both public and private
land managers with affordable and environmentally friendly alternatives
for grasshopper management. In the future, these management strategies
may be the only viable control tactics available for use on significant
amounts of rangeland.
GRASSHOPPERS:
Are They Beneficial?!
 |
|
This eye-catching specimen
was found at Sentinel Butte, ND.
|
Of nearly 400 known grasshopper species in the Western United States,
only about two dozen are considered serious pests. Another dozen
are considered somewhat beneficial since they eat undesirable range
plants. While it's true that grasshoppers can frequently consume
almost a quarter of average annual range forage production, surprisingly
that isn't all bad. Since grasshoppers only digest around 12-21%
of what they eat from growing plants, much of what they consume
is returned for valuable nutrient recycling. Consequently, in low
to moderate numbers, grasshoppers may be beneficial under certain
circumstances.
Moderate grasshopper populations are beneficial in other ways as
well. For example, they are an important food source for other desirable
species found on the prairies, including many songbirds, game birds
and small mammals. Those predators, along with pathogens and parasites,
can help keep grasshopper populations low most of the time. Eradication
of all grasshoppers would have an unfavorable impact on the food
supply for these desirable species, another reason preventative
management is a key component of the ARS grasshopper control effort.
GRAZING:
Can It Control Grasshoppers?
 |
|
Grasshoppers were much less
abundant in twice-over rotational grazing pastures than in
season-long grazing pastures, even in years when grasshoppers
were a problem.
|
Although overgrazing by livestock is known to lead to increased
grasshopper problems, it's possible that grazing management systems
may actually be a key to reducing these problems. Recent ARS research
is generating support for that hypothesis.
Scientists have found that twice-over rotation pastures average
70% fewer grasshoppers when compared to season long grazing pastures
(see graph). Why? Most pest grasshoppers thrive and grow faster
when there are many small patches of bare soil which are ideal sites
for grasshoppers to absorb energy from the sun. Researchers believe
that twice-over grazing causes grass to tiller, which closes up
those bare spots and slows the growth rates of many pest species.
This slower growth rate likely results in higher death rates for
the developing grasshoppers, fewer adults, and less time for the
surviving adults to lay eggs for the next year.
 |
|
Entomologist Dave Branson
samples grasshoppers in a grazing plot near Miles City, Montana.
|
Typical grasshoppers go through 5 stages before becoming adults,
with the largest stages eating the most vegetation. Consequently,
if one can reduce the time that grasshoppers are in the larger stages
by slowing their development one can reduce the impact that
grasshoppers have on rangeland. Although the research is continuing,
habitat differences brought about by grazing patterns clearly appear
to be a key in controlling grasshoppers.
Additional studies are underway to examine a wide range of other
grazing systems to determine how often grazing can be used to keep
grasshopper populations at acceptable levels. ARS scientists in
Sidney and Miles City, Montana, together with university researchers,
are conducting large-scale, long-term studies at four locations
in the Great Plains to find out how different grazing systems affect
grasshopper populations over time. These studies involve sites in
North Dakota, Montana and Nebraska. ARS researchers are also using
cages in small-scale studies to examine how changes in both the
timing and intensity of livestock grazing affect rangeland quality,
as well as grasshopper survival and reproduction.
While several more years of research are needed, these studies
may ultimately provide land managers with new tools that have been
shown to be successful under field conditions.
For more Information, contact David Branson at:
USDA-ARS Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory
1500 North Central Avenue
Sidney, Montana 59270
dbranson@sidney.ars.usda.gov
406-433-9406
|